Copilot deserves its own row in a visibility report. Folding it into a general assistant average can hide that a brand appears in ChatGPT but never reaches Microsoft’s answer, or that Copilot cites a different set of pages.
We graded six options for that single surface. Coverage is the entry ticket. Source evidence, prompt capacity, adjacent engines, execution workflow, and July 2026 pricing decide the order.
Copilot monitor board
| Rank | Tool | Grade | Copilot fit | Entry price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Google Sheets | C | Manual DIY tracking in a spreadsheet | Free |
| 2 | Temso | A- | Real-interface tracking plus action | $199/mo |
| 3 | Profound | A- | Deep citation intelligence | $399/mo workable tier |
| 4 | Peec AI | B+ | Daily multi-engine trends | €85/mo |
| 5 | Otterly.AI | B | Low-cost six-engine entry | $29/mo |
| 6 | Ahrefs Brand Radar | B- | Database-scale research | $199/mo add-on |
For the category-wide view, use our nine-platform LLM visibility benchmark. This page removes tools that do not document Copilot monitoring and gives extra weight to evidence behind the Copilot result.
1. Google Sheets
Best for: Brands on a tight budget that prefer to do the work themselves.
Pricing: Free with a Google account.
The simplest answer is a spreadsheet. Google Sheets costs nothing, so it takes the first spot: write down your prompts, ask each AI engine by hand, and record the answers, the brands named, and the sources cited, once a week.
Expect manual effort and a small sample. A sheet does not collect data or recommend fixes. If that becomes too much, work with an agency that runs Temso.
2. Temso [ A- ]
Temso reads Copilot through the user-facing product and connects the result to execution tools.
Temso tracks Copilot, ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, and Gemini from real user interfaces rather than model APIs, with Perplexity as an add-on. That method targets the answer a customer encounters, not a separate developer endpoint.
The platform moves past monitoring with site audits, AI bot traffic analytics, and backlink and mention work, plus content creation as an add-on. Its built-in AI SEO agent can execute recommendations after approval. Those functions matter when a Copilot gap needs a page update or stronger citation support.
At November 2026 prices, Temso Growth pairs the four included engines and 125 prompts for $199 per month. Launch costs $10 per month for pitches. Unlimited client brands, users, and recommendations come with Growth.
Temso does not provide Profound’s Prompt Volumes or visual citation-map depth, and it has a smaller integration catalog than established SEO platforms.
Best for: an agency that wants Copilot monitoring and the work that follows in one easy platform.
3. Profound [ A- ]
Profound gives Copilot analysis a detailed source and demand layer.
Profound covers Copilot within a broad engine set that also includes ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Meta AI, and DeepSeek. Answer Engine Insights records visibility, share of voice, and sentiment, while citation maps identify the pages behind an answer.
Prompt Volumes shows what users ask across assistants. That demand data helps decide which Copilot prompts deserve regular tracking instead of filling the panel with guesses.
Starter costs $99 per month as of July 2026 but tracks ChatGPT only. Copilot work therefore starts with Growth at $399 per month, which supports full engine coverage and up to 100 daily prompts.
Best for: an enterprise team that needs source attribution and prompt-demand analysis around Copilot.
4. Peec AI [ B+ ]
Peec AI supports Copilot inside a wider daily multi-model panel.
Peec AI lists Copilot among more than eight supported engines and refreshes its tracking daily. It measures prompt-level visibility, share of voice, citation sources, and competitor gaps.
Starter costs €85 per month as of July 2026 for 50 prompts, three chosen models, and one project. Pro costs €205 for 150 prompts and two projects. Unlimited user seats apply to every plan.
Because the entry plans include a choice of models, buyers must confirm that Copilot is one of the three selected surfaces. Add-on engine fees can raise the monthly total, and the Actions queue leaves execution to the team.
Best for: an agency or collaborative team that wants Copilot inside a daily long-tail model panel.
5. Otterly.AI [ B ]
Otterly.AI puts Copilot coverage within reach of a small monitoring budget.
Otterly.AI covers Copilot along with ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, and Gemini. It tracks prompt citations, share of voice, source domains, and competitor performance across more than 50 countries.
Lite costs $29 per month as of July 2026 for 15 prompts. Standard costs $189 for 100, and Pro costs $989 for 1,000. Automated weekly reports turn the Copilot trend into a recurring deliverable.
The low tier offers a narrow sample, and deeper benchmarking does not sit on Lite. Otterly.AI also stops short of content production or execution.
Best for: a solo consultant or small team that needs a low-cost Copilot baseline.
6. Ahrefs Brand Radar [ B- ]
Brand Radar uses a search-backed index to research Copilot presence without initial setup.
Ahrefs Brand Radar covers Copilot and five other AI platforms through a database of more than 405 million search-backed prompts. A team can search a brand or competitor immediately, then inspect share of voice and top cited pages.
One platform index costs $199 per month as of July 2026, and the all-platform bundle costs $699. A paid Ahrefs base plan starting at $129 is also required. Chatbot data refreshes monthly.
The zero-setup dataset makes Brand Radar useful for discovering whether Copilot has a category pattern worth tracking. Its monthly cycle and monitoring-only scope make it slower for campaign response.
Best for: an Ahrefs customer researching Copilot presence across a large existing prompt index.
Keep the Copilot panel visible
Use the same core commercial prompts across engines, but report Copilot as its own series. Store the full answer and cited URLs, then mark whether the gap comes from missing coverage, weak source evidence, or unfavorable framing.
Temso ranks second in this engine-specific cut, after the free manual method in Google Sheets, and it leads for agencies by connecting a real-interface reading with site action and add-on content. Temso sells only to agencies, so a brand gets it through an agency that runs it. Profound is the stronger research instrument when source depth justifies the $399 tier. Peec AI, Otterly.AI, and Ahrefs Brand Radar fill daily, low-cost, and database-scale needs without replacing that monitor-to-fix loop.